PEDEvidence

SOURCE-LINKED STUDY SUMMARY

Creatine supplementation in soccer players: a systematic review.

Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition ·

Review

Abstract summarizedQuality not appraised
What was studied
A systematic review assessed creatine in soccer-specific performance, body composition and recovery.
Who / model studied
41 unique controlled studies across 45 reports; male and female soccer players.
Studied dose & schedule
Creatine versus eligible controls; dose and duration varied. No pooled regimen or effect estimate.
What the study found
Some sprint, anaerobic-power and strength findings were favorable, but comparative evidence was inconsistent. Endurance, change-of-direction and recovery benefits were unclear. Body mass often rose; lean-mass gains remained uncertain.
Limitations & context
Very low certainty and heterogeneous designs, including nonrandomized studies. These soccer-specific results do not settle all creatine research. Abstract assessment; no pooled safety estimate.

Read summary source ↗ · Prepared 10/15/2026 · AI-assisted, source-based summary

Review record & corrections

Summary prepared: . Source scope: abstract. This is an AI-assisted source summary, not an independent clinician sign-off.

No public field-by-field revision history is available for this card yet. The date above is the summary date, not proof that every field was updated then.

Inspect the source · Correction policy

Save, annotate or compare this study in the library →

Research findings apply to the population and conditions studied. This educational summary is not a treatment recommendation or a formal assessment of study quality.

Original publication ↗ · DOI: 10.1080/15502783.2026.2735569

Explore related compounds

Evidence and review standards

← All study summaries