PEDEvidence

SOURCE-LINKED STUDY SUMMARY

Time-restricted feeding plus resistance training in active females: a randomized trial.

The American journal of clinical nutrition ·

Human

Full paper summarizedQuality not appraised
What was studied
This randomized trial tested whether an eight-hour daily eating window, with or without HMB, changed resistance-training adaptations.
Who / model studied
Forty resistance-trained women aged 18–30 entered the intention-to-treat analysis; 24 completed the per-protocol analysis.
Studied dose & schedule
For eight weeks, all groups performed supervised resistance training three days weekly and used whey protein. TRF groups ate from noon to 8 PM; one also received 3 g/day HMB, while controls followed a longer eating schedule.
What the study found
Fat-free mass rose about 2%–3%, muscle thickness and performance improved, and groups did not differ. Fat-mass differences appeared per protocol but not by intention to treat; HMB added no definitive benefit.
Limitations & context
Diet records and eating-window adherence were not objectively verified; the small, female-only sample and eight-week duration limit generalization.

Read summary source ↗ · Prepared 10/6/2026 · AI-assisted, source-based summary

Review record & corrections

Summary prepared: . Source scope: full paper. This is an AI-assisted source summary, not an independent clinician sign-off.

No public field-by-field revision history is available for this card yet. The date above is the summary date, not proof that every field was updated then.

Inspect the source · Correction policy

Save, annotate or compare this study in the library →

Research findings apply to the population and conditions studied. This educational summary is not a treatment recommendation or a formal assessment of study quality.

Original publication ↗ · DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqz126

Explore related compounds

Evidence and review standards

← All study summaries