PEDEvidence

SOURCE-LINKED STUDY SUMMARY

Liraglutide once a day versus exenatide twice a day for type 2 diabetes: a 26-week randomised, parallel-group, multinational, open-label trial (LEAD-6).

Lancet (London, England) ·

Human

What was studied?

LEAD-6 was a randomized, open-label human trial comparing liraglutide with exenatide. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c, a measure of longer-term blood glucose.

What changed?

HbA1c fell 1.12 versus 0.79 percentage points. Weight loss was similar. Liraglutide caused less persistent nausea and fewer minor low-glucose events, but controlled glucose after breakfast and dinner less effectively. Two exenatide-plus-sulphonylurea patients had major low-glucose episodes.

Who was studied?

Adults had inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes despite metformin, a sulphonylurea, or both; 233 received liraglutide and 231 exenatide.

Studied exposure

For 26 weeks, added treatment was liraglutide 1.8 mg daily or exenatide 10 micrograms twice daily.

What remains uncertain?

Treatment was open-label and lasted 26 weeks. No author-stated limitation was available in this abstract.

Abstract summarized · Quality not appraised

Review record & corrections

Summary prepared: . Source scope: abstract. This is an AI-assisted source summary, not an independent clinician sign-off.

No public field-by-field revision history is available for this card yet. The date above is the summary date, not proof that every field was updated then.

Inspect the source · Correction policy

Save, annotate or compare this study in the library →

Research findings apply to the population and conditions studied. This educational summary is not a treatment recommendation or a formal assessment of study quality.

Original publication ↗ · DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60659-0

Explore related compounds

Evidence and review standards

← All study summaries