PEDEvidence@pedevidence

SOURCE-LINKED STUDY SUMMARY

Liraglutide once a day versus exenatide twice a day for type 2 diabetes: a 26-week randomised, parallel-group, multinational, open-label trial (LEAD-6).

Lancet (London, England) ·

Human

Abstract summarizedQuality not appraised
What was studied
LEAD-6 was a randomized, open-label human trial comparing liraglutide with exenatide. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c, a measure of longer-term blood glucose.
Who / model studied
Adults had inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes despite metformin, a sulphonylurea, or both; 233 received liraglutide and 231 exenatide.
Studied dose & schedule
For 26 weeks, added treatment was liraglutide 1.8 mg daily or exenatide 10 micrograms twice daily.
What the study found
HbA1c fell 1.12 versus 0.79 percentage points. Weight loss was similar. Liraglutide caused less persistent nausea and fewer minor low-glucose events, but controlled glucose after breakfast and dinner less effectively. Two exenatide-plus-sulphonylurea patients had major low-glucose episodes.
Limitations & context
Treatment was open-label and lasted 26 weeks. No author-stated limitation was available in this abstract.

Read summary source ↗ · Prepared 9/23/2026 · AI-assisted, source-based summary

Review record & corrections

Summary prepared: . Source scope: abstract. This is an AI-assisted source summary, not an independent clinician sign-off.

No public field-by-field revision history is available for this card yet. The date above is the summary date, not proof that every field was updated then.

Inspect the source · Correction policy

Save, annotate or compare this study in the library →

Research findings apply to the population and conditions studied. This educational summary is not a treatment recommendation or a formal assessment of study quality.

Original publication ↗ · DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60659-0

Explore related compounds

Evidence and review standards

← All study summaries