PEDEvidence
Research interests
COMPARE THE EVIDENCE

GHK-Cu

Findings, possible implications, and reported experiences.

About GHK-Cu

PeptideSkin & repair
Primary research area
Skin · tissue remodeling
Regulatory status
Topical use varies by product
Evidence level
Mixed · limited clinical
Primary mechanism
Copper-bound GHK peptide; tissue-remodeling biology studied
Reference profile available · Coverage varies by section

Also known as copper tripeptide-1

GHK-Cu is a copper complex of the naturally occurring tripeptide glycyl-L-histidyl-L-lysine. It has been studied in skin, wound and tissue-remodeling research. [1][2]

Start with the research

An outcome-specific synthesis has not been prepared for this compound. This is a coverage gap, not evidence that it has no effect.

Open studies and trial records
Uses & research

A small human randomized study evaluated a topical GHK-Cu preparation after carbon-dioxide laser resurfacing; other cited work examined ligament repair in rats. These findings do not establish systemic performance effects. [1][2]

Known half-life

No source-verified value in this profile yet. A treatment schedule or duration of an effect is not a drug half-life.

Half-life describes how quickly the measured drug concentration falls by half. It does not set a dosing interval.
Evidence & important limits

In the cited human study, objective measures did not show a significant difference in erythema, wrinkles or overall skin quality, although participant satisfaction differed. Formulation, route and outcome limit generalization; systemic safety and performance uses remain uncertain. [1]

Safety & evidence boundaries

Source-specific information, not a personal safety clearance or monitoring plan.

In the cited human study, objective measures did not show a significant difference in erythema, wrinkles or overall skin quality, although participant satisfaction differed. Formulation, route and outcome limit generalization; systemic safety and performance uses remain uncertain.

Explore safety questions by system

These are literature filters, not claims that this compound causes each effect. A keyword match is not a confirmed adverse reaction.

Interactions, rare harms, long-term effects and reversibility require separate evidence. Do not infer they are absent when the sources here do not address them.

Identity, names & formulations

Canonical compound: GHK-Cu · ghkcu

Searchable names: copper tripeptide-1

Names share a parent research page. Different esters, salts, routes and brands are not assumed to have the same half-life, indication or exposure.

Combination evidence stays attached to the studied combination. It is not automatically assigned to each ingredient.

Understand the evidence types

Read the model and design first, then the population, outcome and limitations. These categories describe evidence, not a best-compound ranking.

Randomized human trials
Compare assigned interventions. Randomization does not by itself establish low bias or relevance to every population.
Controlled human studies
Use a comparison group; allocation and confounding still matter.
Prospective human research
Follows participants forward. It may be observational or interventional, so this is not a separate quality grade.
Observational human research
Describes associations. Confounding can explain differences.
Case reports and series
Useful for unusual events and safety signals, not reliable rates or effect sizes.
Animal research
Can test biology and function in a living model. Human exposure, benefit and safety remain separate questions.
Cell and tissue research
Tests responses in a preparation, including human-derived cells. It is not a human participant trial.
Mechanistic and computational evidence
Helps explain or predict a pathway; predictions need experimental and clinical testing.
Anecdotal reports
Self-reported experiences can generate questions. Product identity, selection bias and other interventions may be uncontrolled.

Systematic reviews synthesize studies and depend on their quality. Preprint status and abstract versus full-paper reading are separate labels. Citation popularity measures attention, not reliability. A study summary is not a formal quality appraisal.

Sources for this profile

  1. 1. Pickart et al., GHK-Cu after laser resurfacing (2006) Randomized human study · topical skin preparation
  2. 2. GHK-Cu and ACL repair in rats Animal study · rat ligament model

Reference facts checked 2026-09-16. Source scope is listed above; this is not a formal quality appraisal. See each label for full prescribing information.

Browse all studies

Study model describes the source. Confidence depends on methods, replication, population and outcome.

Loading compound research…